Inflation in the construction sector requires a correction of the cost plan.Container school devours a million.In 2019, the city of Lienz calculated around 17.9 million euros for the renovation of the North School.It was already known in 2021 that this calculation would not work, when the municipal council discussed the explosion in prices in the construction sector.In the meantime, 68 percent of the orders for the project have been awarded and a new cost plan has been calculated.Mayor Elisabeth Blanik presented this at the municipal council meeting on June 14th.In the previous meeting, this was discussed in camera.Even if the Lienz team continues to have doubts about the location, there is no going back.The construction site in the north of the city will cost around 26.8 million euros, so the conversion of the north school will cost around nine million euros more than planned.Another cost factor is the interim solution for students and teaching staff.In the meantime, not only the location of the planned container school has been determined, but also the price that will be due for it.The container village that will be erected on Grafendorferstrasse will cost one million euros.Right next to it, SPAR is currently building a new branch.The North Middle School ends the summer semester a week earlier and lives in the containers in the Moarfeld from the start of school in the fall.Meanwhile, the students of the polytechnic will be relocated to the old nursing school at the hospital.Nothing changes for the primary school students at first.After a year, the students of the middle school can then move into their new classrooms while the construction work on the elementary school wing begins.The new school center should be ready in autumn 2024.The construction site on Grafendorferstraße is already busy, and the foundations for the container school are currently being poured."The hummus is temporarily stored on the site of the former Federal Convent and then applied to the container area again," says Blanik.As with the general construction costs, the communities in the affected school district also contribute to the container school.A subsidy is not possible because the state of Tyrol records the "Tin School" as additional costs and not as a construction investment.When it comes to the total costs, however, they want to negotiate with the state about allocations as needed.As City Treasurer Peter Blasisker explained, the cost explosion also increased the amount of the bank loan for the Nordschule from around eleven to 18 million euros.The city of Lienz accounts for 61 percent of this, the rest is repaid by the parishes.According to Blasisker, the costs for the container school would also be repaid with a two-year loan.During the discussion in the municipal council, Franz Theurl (Team Lienz) wanted to know how the price would be secured against further increases."The prices were set as fixed prices for a year," informed the mayor and city architect Klaus Seirer, interjected: "In 2024 we will see where the index value is." Theurl's teammate Ursula Strobl asked about an outdoor sports field: "Is Is that planned for the Nordschule?” Blanik said no, but referred to the three planned indoor sports halls and the many opportunities for exercise in the area.Despite confidentiality in the municipal council, the opposition is making its concerns public.Dear readers, fast, fact-based information is particularly important in times of crisis.Despite the decline in advertising revenue, we are working with great commitment to offer you the best possible - and free of charge!- to inform.If you would like to support our journalistic work with a one-off contribution, you now have the opportunity to do so.We would be glad!Would you like to support dolomitenstadt.at?At that time I would have bought the Franz Josef barracks for a million.Then adapted by several million and we would have a great (and representative!) school.But it is better to wait until the construction costs have reached the ceiling and then build (rebuild).Pure scoundrel prank!EVERYONE with common sense understands that my posting was meant ironically, dear Mr. studied black....However, a cost increase of 50% in such a short time cannot be explained solely on the basis of the current cost increases.Since the municipal council was probably not informed of all the costs when the decision was made, or significant changes have been made since then.Unfortunately, this is now the standard procedure for public construction work.stubborn and stubborn .... the only thing I can think of.meanwhile deposit the humus in the excavation pit, which would have made the perfect place for a school center.with large indoor and outdoor sports facilities.did you hear something like that?what the farmer doesn't know, he won't eat - unfortunately all too true in this case.With these investment costs, a completely new, modern school building could be financed with a little more effort, but it is better to invest in a concrete castle that is getting on in years without a soul and try to raise the profile with a little make-up - simply ridiculousThe site of the former federal convent belongs to the federal government, talks have been held, but not satisfactorily: traffic problem Grafendorferstrasse not solved, chaos already at the high school, the Maxilimianstrasse / Plonerstrasse and Rennerstrasse will sooner or later need an 'exit'.There is also no question of large sports facilities: the property is smaller than the current location, it is not possible to share the sports field with the gymnasium: TIME !!, 3 (three!!) gyms are planned in the new building, and there are 2 in the gym !(Assuming 30 classes in high school and 2 gymnastics lessons per week = 60 hours, plus 15-20 more classes, which would then require 90-100 hours of sports space for 5 days/week).chiller: otherwise your posts are argued rather factually, this is sheer polemical nonsense!The additional effort would be, say, 1/3, a basic purchase of a suitable size (4-6 million) and the demolition and landfill (3-5 million) of the old school together would be at least 1/3, then we would be at 50 million Isn't the 'make-up' cheaper there?A dilapidated concrete block in the worst possible location for a school is to be renovated for 27 million euros?When accountability is then demanded for this bad planning, there is usually no one responsible!You just step back and that's it.If the 'block' weren't 'dilapidated', it wouldn't have to be renovated!Somehow a contradiction in your statement!However, the 'block' is not so dilapidated that a renovation would not pay off.Do you have an idea of ​​the processes involved in building in general and detailed knowledge of this school in particular?Probably not.The decision to rehabilitate this school(s) on this site was made in 2009 under Bgm Hibler!Just a few points to explain: elementary schools should be within walking distance: there are a lot of young families living in and around the Moarfeld (Zeiner-, Tischlerfeld), the number of students has fallen sharply, which is why 8 less classrooms are needed in the VS than they are now 40 years ago, handing over the old school to the BKH would mean that the city paid the purchase price to itself (as the BKH member with the largest share of departures), etc..Have you ever considered the cost of demolition and especially disposal of old school building materials?Anyone who has ever torn out a 'Wandl' at home knows the cost of just a single dump of rubble.To speak of a bad location shows ignorance: the school is centrally located for the large residential area, can be reached by the children on foot or by bus in 3 minutes, is car-free, the location is very quiet, sometimes exciting when a helicopter must land.The most exciting point at the end: A new building on a green field (if affordable land can be found, the ground will be sealed again) would cost another 10-15 million more (without disposal of the old school), bus traffic would increase (all children need buses), parking spaces necessary for teachers (at the BKH: garage) and would hardly find the consent of the district communities!After all, they share 39% of the costs.In my opinion, complete misplanning and not up to the current standard of a school.No outdoor sports field.No infrastructure for afternoon care.The current one is also unworthy of a city like Lienz.No meaningful connection to public transport, no green space that children can experience something with and from nature.This planning and construction can only be released by persons who themselves no longer have children of school age.Perhaps the community should have organized an excursion to Virgen.If you want, you can always find a hair in the soup.In our area, the children have green spaces and nature on their doorstep all afternoon.Of course, only if parents or grandparents are not too comfortable exploring nature with the children.There are single parents who have no grandparents and no garden.By the way, there are also families in which both parents work and the children are looked after because the house has to be paid for, women don't want to live in poverty in old age..... Do you think that they are all lazy people?It doesn't matter what it costs.It's just our tax money anyway and that has been wasted in the last 2.5 years by politicians & co.A few thousand never matters...Alternatives have already been considered: back into the forest, up on the Bam!Such a stupid message!It doesn't matter what it costs, of course, but if you have alternatives, please tell us!Or else like at American film weddings: may he be silent forever, the climbing maxi!(or only speak again when after sufficient schooling the 'maxi' has become 'max')!You must be logged in to post.Login or Register